Assessment 1 Instructions: Part A and Part B
Assessment 1
Written long answer question tasks
Total marks: 30%
Word count: 500 words for the section A – Analysis
Section B – 1500 – 2000 words for 15 long answers questions
Due date: Sunday of Week 5
a) Description
The goal of this assessment is to test your understanding of some fundamental concepts
and terms used in welfare law, and your capacity to apply these concepts to practical
scenarios involving clients.
b) Format
Students are required to analyse a series of questions involving one case study to test
understanding and application of the concepts and issues addressed in the readings,
lectures and tutorials from Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4.
This case study, questions and instructions contained in the file will be available three weeks
before the due date.
Note
Jurisdiction-specific context
Your response to the scenarios and circumstances involved in this case study may also
require you to undertake research to identify and apply the framework of services and
arrangements involving the departmental, legislative, court, tribunal and administrative
structures that operate in and are applicable to a specific jurisdiction (ie State or Territory in
which you reside.2
Research literature
Your answers must be based on a review of the literature and should include at least three
primary academic references, ie peer-reviewed (scholarly) journal articles or book chapters.
By developing a jurisdiction-specific approach, this has broader relevance and also is applicable to placements
and other client relevant contexts.
Do not rely upon non-academic and other web-based secondary references as these do
not constitute academic references for the purpose of your assignment, which if relied
upon for theoretical support, may mean you have NOT met the requirements of the
assessment.
Referencing
You must use APA 7 referencing.
References: You must include a references section in your assessment and
acknowledge any sources that you use, including all web-based sources.
Table of legislation: Any legislation (ie Acts and regulations) that may have been
cited should be listed separately in a Table of legislation (follows References).
Structure of this assessment
Title: Welfare Law, Ethics, and the Australian Legal System: Case Study and Long-Answer
Questions
Instructions:
This assessment is divided into two parts:
- Case Study Analysis
- Long-Answer Questions
Both parts assess your understanding of welfare law, ethical practice, decision-making,
and the Australian legal system. Ensure your responses are well-structured, reflect critical
thinking, and demonstrate the integration of legal and ethical principles.
Part 1: Case Study Analysis
Scenario Overview:
Read the case study provided. The scenario outlines a complex situation faced by a
community services professional working within welfare law and ethical guidelines.
Tasks:
You are required to:
Identify and discuss the legal and ethical issues presented in the case.
Reference relevant principles of welfare law, including statutory and common law,
procedural fairness, and administrative law.
Propose appropriate actions the human services professional should take,
supported by sound reasoning.
Highlight any implications of the decisions on the client and the organization.
Word Limit: 500 words.
Structure for Case Study Response:
Introduction
Briefly summarize the key aspects of the case.
State the primary legal and ethical concerns.
Identification and Analysis of Issues
Discuss the relevant legal principles (e.g., statutory and common law, procedural fairness).
Explain ethical considerations using applicable codes of ethics.
Proposed Actions and Justification
Recommend actions the community services professional should take.
Justify these actions with evidence from legal and ethical frameworks.
Conclusion
Summarise key findings and implications.
Part 2: Long-Answer Questions
Question Overview:
You are required to answer 15 long-answer questions that explore concepts covered in
Weeks 1–4. These questions focus on welfare law principles, ethical decision-making, and
the integration of statutory and common law into human services practices.
Tasks:
Provide detailed responses to each question.
Include references to case law, legislation, and ethical frameworks where
appropriate.
Demonstrate your ability to critically analyze and apply theoretical knowledge to
practical scenarios.
Word Limit: Approximately 100–200 words per question.
Formatting Guidelines
Use 12-point Times New Roman font, 1.5 line spacing, and standard margins.
Include a title page with your name, student ID, assessment title, and submission date.
Use headings and subheadings to organize your responses.
Cite all references using the APA 7th Edition format.
Assessment Criteria
Your work will be assessed based on the following:
Understanding of Legal and Ethical Principles
Application of Theories to Practice
Critical Thinking and Analysis
Structure and Organization
Use of References and Evidence
Refer to the Marking Rubric for detailed expectations for each grade level
Assessment Criteria
Criteria Mark Weighting (%)
Case study (analysis) 10 40
Case study long answers (15
questions)
20 60
Total 30 100%
Criteria HD
(80-100%)
D
(70-79%)
C
(60-69%)
P
(50-59%)
NN
(0-50%)
Understanding of
Legal and Ethical
Principles
30 Exceptional understanding
with critical analysis and
comprehensive integration
of laws and ethics.
Demonstrates strong
understanding with
detailed application of
laws and ethics.
Shows sound
understanding, references
key laws and ethical
principles.
Demonstrates basic
understanding with
minimal references to laws
or ethics.
Fails to demonstrate
understanding; lacks
reference to relevant laws
or ethics.
Application of
Theories to
Practice
30 Outstanding application
with innovative solutions
and critical insight.
Strong application with
examples and sound
reasoning.
Applies theories effectively
with some practical insight.
Applies theories
superficially without deep
engagement.
Does not apply theories or
provides irrelevant
application.
Critical Thinking
and Analysis 20 Exceptional analysis with
depth, originality, and
coherence.
Strong critical analysis
with insightful
observations.
Demonstrates critical
thinking with clear analysis.
Limited critical thinking;
basic analysis evident.
Lacks analysis: responses
are superficial or irrelevant.
Structure and
Organization 10 Flawless organization with
seamless transitions and
clarity.
Highly organized with
clear and logical
progression.
Well-organized and clear;
minor inconsistencies.
Basic structure: some
clarity but lacks coherence.
Disorganized, unclear, or
incomplete responses.
Use of
References and
Evidence
10 Exceptional referencing
with wide-ranging, credible
sources.
Extensive referencing with
strong evidence.
Sound referencing with
appropriate evidence.
Minimal referencing; limited
use of evidence.
No references or
unsupported claims.
100
Click here for answers https://bestgradesesssays.com